
Vol. 326.
Salt Lake City, Utah, Wednesday, March 16, 1949.
No. 74.

Joseph Smith, Prophet of God
Did Joseph Smith Write the Book of Mormon?
By ELDER JOHN A. WIDSTOE
Of the Council of Twelve
(Address delivered Sunday, March 13, 1949,
at 9 p.m., over Radio Station KSL)
Dear Radio Friends:
To ask if Joseph Smith produced the Book of Mormon seems unnecessary. Of course, he was the translator unaided by mortal man. Yet,
it may be worth while to examine into the wide-spread theory of anti-Mormon writers that Joseph had helpers in the production of
the Book.
When the Book of Mormon was first published, no question was raised about its authorship or authenticity. Over several years Joseph
Smith had told the story of the visitation of Moroni, the promise of the golden plates, when he received them, and how he devoted
time to their translation.
The earliest writers in opposition to the Church accepted Joseph Smith as the author of the book. In their
opinion its language and contents proved it to be the product of an unlearned and untaught person, such as Joseph Smith was held to be. For
example, Alexander Campbell, the leader of the Church of Disciples, who had lost to Joseph Smith some capable followers, wrote in 1831
that Joseph Smith was the author and that the Book of Mormon contained only the gossip of the neighborhood, in which every religious
problem of the day was discussed in crude language. (1)
However, after people had had time to give the book more careful examination, and thousands had joined the Church, doubts began to
arise in the minds of many as to whether Joseph Smith, the plow-boy, was indeed the author of the book. Its language was found not
to be crude, but generally beautiful and inspiring. The book was found to present religious ideas in full harmony with the doctrine
of the Lord Jesus Christ. Important religious problems were given a simple, understandable explanation. It was, in its own words, a
witness for Christ. The book seemed to be beyond the power of Joseph Smith to produce.
So the theory was advanced that Joseph must have had help to produce the book. Some enemies went so far as to suggest that it was
wholly written by someone else! This was just what the unbelievers wanted, apparently without recognizing that such a theory would
be a powerful evidence of the truth of Joseph's story. He had help, but from divine sources! Careless writers in their enmity of Joseph
Smith have built upon such a theory for a century or more.
The first book to put the theory that Joseph Smith had helped in writing the Book of Mormon, into wide circulation was the book
"Mormonism Unvailed," written by Philastrus Hurlburt, an acknowledged enemy. From this book, published in 1834, nearly all anti-Mormon
books have drawn their material.
The theory was there advanced that Joseph Smith had had a silent partner in his work. It was inferred that this person was Sidney
Rigdon, a close friend and colleague of Alexander Campbell, who had joined the Church in November 1831, after a careful and searching
inquiry into the truth of Mormonism. He was an eloquent preacher of some learning, and an outstanding man wherever he went.
It was suggested that this man had written the theological, or religious portion of the Book of Mormon; and that the historical setting
of the book was also furnished by him by plagiarizing an unpublished novel called "The Manuscript Found," written nearly twenty years
earlier by one Solomon Spaulding, declared Atheist, about the ancient peoples of America. Rigdon was supposed to have purloined the
manuscript from the printer with whom it had been deposited.
The Book of Mormon, according to this theory, was nothing more than this Spaulding Story, ornamented with Rigdon's religious emanations.
This theory was as a raft at sea for the helpless enemies of Joseph Smith, and it has been peddled industriously by anti-Mormon writers
for the delectation of unwary readers.
The tale called "The Manuscript Found" is a story of a party of Romans who came to America, and an account of their life there. The
story was read by Mr. Spaulding to his family and some friends. Several persons who had heard the story read fifteen or twenty years
earlier were induced to sign a statement that the languages and the characters in the story fitted in with the contents of the Book
of Mormon. This was enough to set up and circulate the theory that the Book of Mormon was based upon it.
Unfortunately for the Rigdon-Spaulding theory, the manuscript of the Spaulding story was discovered in 1884 among the possessions of
Mr. L. L. Rice of Honolulu, who had secured the literary remains of Spaulding. (2) The Spaulding story has since been published in
two editions. It bears no resemblance in language, style, names, or subject matter to the Book of Mormon.
In utter despair, the enemies of the Church fled for cover. A few proceeded to set up another theory, that Spaulding had written more
than one story, and that the one found was not the one that resembled the Book of Mormon. This discovered Spaulding manuscript was
identified with the one set up in the book, "Mormonism Unvailed."
Moreover, destructive to the theory, the names of the people who thought that the Spaulding story as read by them many years before
and the Book of Mormon story were similar, were found endorsed on the discovered manuscript as those who knew it in Spaulding's day.
The Spaulding theory of the origin of the Book of Mormon has been thoroughly demolished. Anyone who peddles this theory today betrays
deliberate dishonesty, or pitiful lack of knowledge concerning the whole matter.
That Sidney Rigdon ever saw the Prophet Joseph Smith before the Book of Mormon was published has been disproved. His activities and
His first visit to Palmyra, so far as can be learned, was after the organization of the Church. At that time he had his first meeting
with the Prophet Joseph Smith. Printed non-Mormon contemporaneous reports of Rigdon's acceptance of the gospel do not mention or hint
of any previous meeting of Joseph Smith and Rigdon. Historical evidence fails to prove any earlier connection between Sidney Rigdon
and Joseph Smith.
Therefore, diehard anti-Mormon writers have suggested that to help produce the Book of Mormon Sidney Rigdon traveled long distances
met Joseph Smith as a mysterious stranger unknown to the community. That theory is not only unlikely, and unproved, but absurd,
lodged only in the minds of those who refuse any evidence that Joseph Smith told the truth.
Sidney Rigdon himself testified time and again that the first time he saw the Book of Mormon was in Mentor, Ohio, near Kirtland, after
the Book of Mormon was published and the Church organized. Then, Parley P. Pratt, a former colleague in the Disciples Church gave him
a copy. Elder Pratt was one of four Mormon elders traveling through the Kirtland territory to do missionary work among the Indians.
They stopped for some time in and near Kirtland to preach and bear witness of the restored gospel. They held long conferences with
Sidney Rigdon. Rigdon declared this to be the first time that he had ever seen the Book of Mormon or known of its contents. His son,
John W. Rigdon, who joined the Church, testified that when his father, Sidney Rigdon, lay upon his deathbed, he, John W. Rigdon, put
the question of the origin of the Book of Mormon to his father. The result is best told in his own words:
"You have been charged with writing that Book of Mormon and giving it to Joseph Smith to introduce
to the world. You have always told me one story, that you never saw the book until it was presented
to you by Parley P. Pratt and Oliver Cowdery. That all you ever knew of the origin of that book was
what they told you, and what Joseph Smith and the witnesses who have claimed to have seen the plates
have told you.
"Is this true? If so, all right. If it is not, you owe it to me and to your family to tell it. You
are an old man, and you will soon pass away, and I wish to know if Joseph Smith in your intimacy
with him for fourteen years has not said something to you that led you to believe he obtained that
book in some other way than that which he has told you. Give me all you know about it that I may know
the truth,
"My Father looked at me a moment and raised his hand above his head and slowly said with tears
glistening in his eyes, 'My son, I can swear before high heaven, that what I have told you about
the origin of that book is true. Your mother and sister, Mrs. Obega [sic - Athea or Athalia] Robinson,
were present when that book was handed to me in Mentor, Ohio, and all I ever knew about the origin
of that book was what Parley P. Pratt, Oliver Cowdery, Joseph Smith, and the witnesses who claimed
they saw the plates have told me.
"'And with all my intimacy with Joseph Smith he never told me but one story, and that was that he
found it engraved on gold plates in a hill near Palmyra, New York, and that an angel had appeared to
him and had directed him where to find it and I have never to you nor to anyone else told but the
one story and that I now repeat to you.' I believed him and now believe he told me the truth. He also
said to me after that, 'Mormonism is true, that Joseph Smith was a Prophet, and this world would find
it out some day.;" (4)
The Rigdon-Spaulding explanation of the Book of Mormon, now thoroughly disproved, has no historical foundation, but was clearly
manufactured by a dishonest writer in hate of Joseph Smith. It remains an evidence of the ugly dishonesty that may enter the mind
of hate. (5)
In the face of intense, long continued research, the theory has been thoroughly discredited by competent historians. It is now used
only by those who love their prejudices more than truth, but often enough to disturb the uninformed.
After a century of fruitless hunting, Sidney Rigdon is really the only person who has been charged with being a helper to Joseph
Smith in the writing of the Book of Mormon. In view of the proof that Rigdon did not help him, Joseph Smith remains the sole producer
of the book, unaided by any mortal person.
Those who cannot or will not believe that Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon have then had only one other theory to fall back upon.
I. W. Riley in his book, "The Founder of Mormonism," a "psychological" study of Joseph Smith, accepts the Book of Mormon as a product
of Joseph Smith's mind, but believes that it was written by him while he was in an epileptic state.
If that be accepted, Joseph Smith must have been seized by such fits, regularly, forenoon and afternoon, possibly during meals, during
the ninety days in which the Book of Mormon was translated and then was free from such fits the remainder of his life. That theory,
smacking of Arabian Nights fables, is so strained as to be an insult to the credulity of intelligent people.
It is merely an admission that students of Joseph Smith stand helpless before the interpretation of the work he did, unless they accept
the statements of Joseph Smith himself. His own frank admission is that the Book of Mormon was produced by the "gift and power of God."
A variation of these theories has recently appeared. Gasping for breath, the opponents of Joseph Smith now assert that he possessed
tremendous mental power which enabled him to write the Book of Mormon, but also that he was so deficient in moral sense as to palm
off his work as coming from God. That's old stuff. Joseph's life of rectitude is a sufficient answer. The theory is probably the death
rattle of the defeated critics of Joseph Smith.
After examining the long shelves of books on Mormonism, a wearisome and thankless task, there is but one conclusion: Joseph Smith
wrote the Book of Mormon unaided by mortal man. That is also the verdict of history.
Next week we shall discuss the Dilemma of Authority.
1 Alexander Campbell, "Delusions."
2 F. W. Kirkham, "A New Witness for Christ in America," p. 344.
3 Charles A. Shook, "The True Origin of the Book of Mormon." p. 71.
4 Rigdon, John W., "Life of Sidney Rigdon;" History of the Church; F. W. Kirkham,
"A New Witness for Christ in America," pp. 327-329
5 See Daryl Chase, "Sidney Rigdon, Early Mormon," unpublished thesis, University of Chicago.
Note 1: A revised, expanded version of the above article later appeared as
in the writer's book Joseph Smith:Seeker after Truth.
Note 2: Elder Widstoe says that "The earliest writers in opposition to the Church accepted Joseph Smith as the author of
the book." This was a natural, uninformed assumption, since the 1830 title page listed him as being the "author;" -- or, at least
Smith was sometimes viewd as the "reputed author." See John St. John's use of that term, in his Cleveland Herald "Golden Bible"
article of Nov. 25, 1830. St. John, who knew Oliver, blamed
him for at least part of the book's composition: "the only opinion we have of the origin of this Golden Bible, is that Mr. Cowdry
and Mr. Smith the reputed author, have taken the old Bible to keep up a train of circumstances, and by altering names and language
have produced the string of Jargon called the 'Book of Mormon.'" Several near-contemporary published accounts point to Oliver Cowdery
as being a knowing partner in religious deception with Joseph Smith. See, for example, Ezra Booth's
letter of Sept. 12, 1831, where he says: "I have had several
interviews with Messrs. Smith, Rigdon and Cowdery, and the various shifts and turns, to which they resorted... produced in my mind
additional evidence, that their's is nothing else than a deeply laid plan of craft and deception." The
Nov. 16, 1830 issue of the Painesville Telegraph also
paints Cowdery as a "person here, who pretends to have a divine mission, and to have seen and conversed with Angels;" -- thus linking
him closely with the pretensions of Joseph Smith, to have received "instruction from Angels." Orsamus Turner's "The Golden Bible"
article of May 1, 1831 also links Smith and Cowdery as the
"principal" and "second" personages in "a scheme...of imposition, a cheat... based upon entire fallacy and delusion." Turner calls
Smith and Cowdery the "projectors of the scheme" who tried to make the Book of Mormon "story, historically consistent." Several other
early assertions, pointing to Oliver Cowdery as a co-writer of the Book of Mormon might also be easily tabulated.
Note 3: Elder Widstoe's view, of how Sidney Rigdon's name became connected with Book of Mormon authorship assertions, is also in error.
Rigdon was singled out as the probable author as early as the
Feb. 2, 1831 article published in the Cleveland
Advertiser, which reads: "Rigdon was formerly a disciple of Campbell's and who it is said was sent out to make proselytes, but
is probable he thought he should find it more advantageous to operate on his own capital, and therefore wrote, as it is believed the
Book of Mormon." As Rigdon's assistant, Elder Parley P. Pratt said,
in 1838: "Early in 1831, Mr. Rigdon having been ordained, under
our hands, visited elder J. Smith, Jr., in the state of New-York, for the first time; and from that time forth, rumor began to
circulate, that he (Rigdon) was the author of the Book of Mormon." While such charges of clandestine pseudo-scriptural authorship are
understandable in a partisan religious newspaper, like the Hudson Observer, they are less expected to appear in the pages of
secular papers, such as the Cleveland Advertiser The Nov. 18, 1830
Observer called the religion Rigdon embraced "Campbellism Improved;" but it was the Advertiser's editor who went a step
beyond that, in speaking of "a noted mountebank by the name of Elder Rigdon."
|